JOIN US AT Offshore Technology Conference 2025 - Booth 3813 - NRG Park - HOUSTON, TX - MAY 5-8)

Join a diverse mix of decision-makers, engineers, and innovators across the energy sector. Talk with our specialists at the HEC Exhibitor Booth (3813). Find out about the newest developments. Julian (Bud) Gaitley, Nourhan Elsayed, Nick DelGatto, and Hendrik Bruhns from HEC will attend.

OTC offers a diverse portfolio of events that are tailored to the offshore energy industry’s unique regional and technical needs. Join us and other industry professionals from 5–8 May 2025 to share your knowledge, experience, and vision.

GIVE US A CALL TO MEET UP

Contact:

Hendrik Bruhns; ++1 5103567581

“Since 1969, the Offshore Technology Conference (OTC) has served as a central hub convening energy professionals worldwide to share ideas and innovations, discuss, debate, and build consensus around the most pressing topics facing the offshore energy sector. As the world transitions to a more sustainable and low-carbon future, no other event provides attendees diverse conversations focused on the latest developments needed to accelerate the global energy mix. Whether it's oil and gas, solar, wind, hydrogen, and other marine resources, these conversations will be centered around the innovations that could help shift and drive the world’s energy mix. “

For more info >
See who’s attending, Exhibition Map >

Herbert Briefing: MEPC 83 - Part 1

Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 83 Meeting Brief

International Maritime Organization - Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC)

Background

As anticipated, the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 83, which wrapped up on April 11th, along with the two earlier interim meetings of The Intersessional Working Group on Reduction of Greenhouse Gas (ISWG-GHG) 18 and 19, were notably eventful.

MEPC approved a landmark fee-based mid-term Greenhouse Gas (GHG) reduction measure that should be formally adopted in October and would then go into effect in March 2027 at the earliest, but likely in 2028. The measure was not adopted by acclamation, as it was the preferred MEPC practice, but by a majority roll-call vote of the IMO member countries.

The Vote

The vote exposed the multiple factions and their positions on fee-based regulations to limit GHG emissions. First, in a bombshell announcement early in the week, the US withdrew from the session, encouraged other nations to do likewise, and threatened reciprocal measures against any fees charged to US ships.

Sixteen mainly Middle Eastern and oil-producing states wholly rejected the measure. Many member states abstained at that time, including the critical bloc of Pacific Island nations that pushed hard for a more stringent levy on all carbon emissions, not just those exceeding an annual target. However, 63 of the 79 voting countries, including most European nations, Japan, Brazil, India, China, and some South American and African states voted to adopt the measure.

What was adopted

The approved measure for ships over 5000 gross tonnage (GT) is a two-tier compliance regulation based on the comparison of each ship’s well-to-wake (WtW) annual GHG fuel intensity compared to the 1st tier (Base) and the 2nd tier (Direct Compliance) targets. The emission reduction levels have been set initially for 2028 through 2035. They are reductions compared to the base WtW GHG fuel intensity (GFI) level for standard fossil fuels in 2008 of 93.3 gCO2eq/MJ  (grams of CO2 equivalent emissions per Mega Joule of energy). Remedial Units for fuel emission levels exceeding the more modest Tier 1-based level would be priced at $380 per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq) emissions on a well-to-wake basis. Remedial Units for GFI fuel level emissions exceeding the Tier 2 level emissions would be priced at $100 per tonne of CO2eq emissions on a well-to-wake basis. It’s only a fee for carbon exceeding one or both of the 2-tier thresholds. If you meet the thresholds, there is no carbon payment. GHG intensity reduction levels for Tier 1 begin at 4% for 2028 and reach 30% in 2035, and for Tier 2, they start at 17% in 2028 and reach 43% in 2034. See the graph below.

MEPC 83 2-Tier GFI Measure: IMO Net Zero Framework

Part of the regulation mandates unspecified rewards for the early adoption of “zero or near zero” carbon fuels

Payments are made by purchasing the Remedial Units, with fees going into an IMO-administered Net-Zero GHG fund. Ships can also receive Surplus Units for reductions exceeding the Tier 2 reduction targets, with these Surplus Units being banked, traded, or transferred to other ships to cancel Remedial Units.

Impact on Shipping and GHG Emissions

Only time will tell, but some estimate that the measure may generate around $30-$40 billion in the first two years and about $10 billion annually, with funds used to subsidize the transition to low-carbon fuels and climate projects in developing countries.

Theoretically, zero would be deposited in the IMO fund if all ships complied with the Tier 2 targets. Still, there will likely be insufficient quantities of low-carbon fuel for full international fleet compliance, at least in the early years. But the measure also means fossil fuels can continue to be burned well into the future, limited only by the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) and regulations Energy Efficiency Design Index) (EEDI), (which have now been extended to 2030), with increasing financial penalties for required purchases of Remedial Units.

Many national delegations and environmental nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) believe that this measure will fall short of meeting the IMO's ambitious strategic goals of 20-30% GHG reductions by 2030, 70-80% by 2040, and ultimately net zero in 2050, which were adopted in 2023. However, depending on the attained and measured GHG reductions, the plan includes a provision for adjusting the targets in 2031.

The IMO Process and Reactions

IMO functions as a consensus organization, usually finding a middle ground for safety and environmental regulations. Relatively non-contentious issues are traditionally approved by acclamation, and contentious issues are approved by vote. Conventions are enacted by a 2/3 approval of member states, or amendments to existing conventions are approved tacitly by not receiving rejection by 1/3 member states within 24 months.

With 170 member countries and 110 participating NGOs, this process often requires hard-fought compromises from many and results in regulations that represent not the highest standard but rather the highest standard that enough members of the IMO can support.

In this case, we have very contentious issues of climate change, GHG reductions, and the first-ever international regulations using financial incentives and potential carbon levies. The IMO did precisely what it promised and adopted mid-term GHG reduction measures with both a technical and financial component by the end of the MEPC 83rd session.

Some countries could not support such a measure as it was deemed too stringent, and some felt it was ineffective in meeting IMO’s overall goals without a carbon price for all CO2 emissions.

what was passed was the world’s first mandatory global carbon pricing mechanism. Several major shipping industry groups positively noted the IMO outcome:


Guy Platten, Secretary General of the International Chamber of Shipping, said:

“Today will hopefully be remembered as a historic moment for our industry. If formally adopted, shipping will be the first sector to have a globally agreed carbon price, something which ICS has been advocating for since COP 26 (UN Climate Change Conference ) in 2021, when the industry agreed a net zero 2050 target.”

“Shipping is now at the forefront of efforts to decarbonize rapidly to address the climate crisis. The world’s governments have now come forward with a comprehensive agreement which, although not perfect in every respect, we very much hope will be formally adopted later this year. On behalf of the industry, I would like to thank Member States and the IMO for their exceptional hard work in achieving this agreement in challenging political circumstances.”


World Shipping Council President & CEO Joe Kramek said:

“This is a major milestone for climate policy and a turning point for shipping. Our industry has long been labelled as ‘hard to abate,’ but record industry investment and a new global measure can turn the tide on that.”


Join us at CMA 2025 - Stamford, CT - April 1-3 - Booth 244

Join us at CMA 2025 - Stamford, CT - April 1-3 - Booth 244

Get ready to celebrate 40 years of CMA Shipping!

Join us for a landmark edition of North America's premier shipping event! Whichever way you choose to take part, this year's event is set to be a truly unforgettable occasion. Talk with our specialists at the HEC Exhibitor Booth (244) at the Hilton Stamford | Connecticut, USA. Find out about the newest developments in environmental requirements and more. Ryan Flanagan, Nick DelGatto, and Eugene van Rynbach from HEC will attend.

For more info >

Source solutions from leading maritime suppliers: The expo at CMA Shipping is your destination for finding maritime suppliers, solutions, and services that can help improve your operation. The interactive conference at CMA Shipping is renowned for its high-profile thought leaders and in-depth discussion points. Learn from leading global experts and discover actionable insights into the latest industry trends, challenges, innovations, and opportunities across the maritime market.“

Herbert Briefing: MEPC 82

ISWG-GHG 17 and MEPC 82 Meeting Brief

International Maritime Organization - Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC)

Background

The IMO again held ‘back-to-back’ meetings in London for the 17th session of the Intersessional Working Group on GHG emissions (ISWG-GHG) on the 23rd to 27th of September 2024 and the subsequent 82nd session of the Marine Environmental Protection Committee (MEPC) on the following week of 30 September to 4 October.

The topics addressed at the meeting were:

·       Modifications and improvements to the short-term GHG measures (CII & EEDI)

·       Mid-term measures for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions

·       Washwater effluent from exhaust scrubbers

·       Guidelines to reduce Arctic black carbon emission

·       Amendments to the Ballast Water Convention

·       Guidelines for managing plastic pollution at sea

·       Proposed new ECA’s in the Canadian Arctic and Norwegian Sea

·       Approving plans to reduce underwater radiated noise

This brief focuses on the first two main issues.

Short-term GHG Measures (Modifications to the CII and EEDI

Short-term measures (EEDI for new ships, and CII plus SEEMP for all ships operating) are intended to support the IMO’s ambition of net-zero by 2050, and in particular, the ambition of short-term reduction of CO2 emissions per transport work target of 40%, and the overall decrease in GHG emissions by 20%-30%, by 2030.

Three main issues remain to be addressed for these short-term regulations:

·       The reduction factors for the years 2027-2030 and beyond, which were left unspecified in the initial CII regulations

·       Consideration of a large number of specific improvements and ship type adjustments in the CII

·       Methodology of transitioning from tank-to-wake (TtW) to well-to-wake (WtW) fuel factors for the CII regulations

While the working group at MEPC 82 discussed many items, decisions on them were deferred. The 2027-2030 reduction factors and a few adjustments (handling port and idle time, short voyages, cruise ships' time in port) will be resolved before January 2026. The remaining issues (adjustments for bulk carriers, adverse weather considerations, ballast voyages, refer cargo, ro-ro passenger ships, and WtW factors) were further deferred beyond January 2026.

Mid-term Measures for GHG Emissions

Possible mid-term measures, scheduled to come into force in January 2027 (some delegations favor January 2028), are intended to support and incentivize the transitions to meet the IMO’s ambitions for net-zero GHG emissions in 2050, including the intermediate targets in 2030 and 2040.

The desired January 2027 enforcement date requires that the mid-term measures be completed for approval at the next MEPC 83 meeting in April 2025.

As anticipated, no decisions were made at this session, and ongoing discussions on the possible mid-term measure options and the framework for the MARPOL text progressed at both ISWG-GHG 17 and MEPC 82.

The discussions indicated that many member countries support combining technical and economic measures to incentivize the transition to net zero. There is broad support for applying the measures initially to all ships over 5000 GT on international voyages (and later to ships down to 400GT).

The technical measure is converging on a GHG fuel intensity requirement called GFI. GFI is the amount of GHG emissions per unit of energy used, and it is to be adjusted annually to mirror the IMO GHG emission targets of a 30% reduction in 2030, an 80% reduction in 2040, and net zero in 2050 (compared to the 2008 baseline). GHG accounting is to be based on well-to-wake (WtW) emissions.

Multiple economic measures are under consideration, but they seem to converge some form of GLG levy or pricing per ton of CO2 equivalent, with payments collected over the annual target intensity and credits dispersed under the annual target intensity. Some proposals permit fleet pooling, trading, and banking of credits to reward early adopters of zero and near-zero carbon technologies.

There is also broad support that the funds generated from the economic measures are to be deposited into an IMO-controlled fund to be directed to support transition initiatives.

The working group and MEPC have produced a broadly supported draft of MARPOL Annex VI Chapter 5, including all the proposed options. This draft will now become the basis for the upcoming discussions and negotiations.

Summary and possible outcomes

As generally anticipated, MEPC 82 was a relatively relaxed and congenial session with no final decisions about the short- and mid-term GHG measures. MEPC 83 in April 2025, supported by two interim ISWG-GHG meetings, 18 & 19, is likely to be very different, potentially contentious, and challenging. While there appears to be growing consensus around some fee-based GHG incentive measures supporting the agreed GHG reduction ambitions, some nations remain opposed, and many member states have not yet expressed their views. However, the IMO usually has a way of meeting its self-imposed deadlines. MEPC 83 will likely approve some of these mid-term measures and implement a new GHG chapter of MARPOL Annex VI for adoption. Still, the negotiated specifics will make all the difference.

International WorkBoat Show - 12-14 NOVEMBER 2024 | New Orleans, LA


We invite you to meet us at BOOTH 2964, at the International WorkBoat Show at the Morial Convention Center in New Orleans, Louisiana.

Take Advantage of the Experience That Only Comes Once a Year.

The cutting-edge of commercial marine meets a 44-year maritime industry tradition at The International WorkBoat Show.  As the maritime industry embraces innovation, The WorkBoat Show remains at the forefront, driving progress and propelling the industry forward.

GIVE US A CALL TO MEET UP @BOOTH 2964:

Hendrik Bruhns, HEC President: Mobile: +1 5103567581  | hbruhns@herbert.com

Nick Delgato, Vice President, Operations Manager: ndelgatto@herbert.com

Julian (Bud) Gaitley, Senior Associate Marine Engineer; Mobile: +7134177801 | jgaitley@herbert.com

Nourhan Elsayed, Senior Marine Engineer: Mobile: +13489324408 | nelasayed@herbert.com

This trade-only conference and expo for commercial vessel owners, operators, builders, vendors, and suppliers that serve them will offer full access to today’s leaders. Herbert Engineering Corp. will be there and happy to talk to you about Retrofits, Emissions Reduction, Regulatory Compliance Developments, and more.

Source:https://www.workboatshow.com